| Source | What it reported | Date |
|---|---|---|
| USA Herald | Trial is scheduled before Judge Edward B. Moreton Jr.; Augustine alleges permanent brain damage and financial losses. | Sept. 30, 2026 |
| New York Post | A filing says Schwarzenegger admits running a red light; the case now focuses on claimed damages. | Sept. 30, 2026 |
What did the latest reports say?
USA Herald reported that the civil trial involving Augustine is scheduled to begin Oct. 12 at the Beverly Hills Courthouse, with Schwarzenegger expected to testify after jury selection and opening statements. The outlet said the case stems from a Jan. 21, 2022 collision at Sunset Boulevard and Allenford Avenue, where Augustine alleges Schwarzenegger drove a GMC Yukon through a red signal and hit her Toyota Prius.
The New York Post reported that the lawsuit names Schwarzenegger and his production company. The Post quoted a filing stating, "Mr. Schwarzenegger now admits he ran a red light while driving his SUV, causing the accident." USA Herald reported that Schwarzenegger's attorneys continue to dispute the amount of damages Augustine claims.
What issues remain for the jury?
USA Herald reported that Augustine claims loss of consciousness, permanent brain damage, injuries affecting her body and nervous system, medical expenses, lost income and limits on future work. The Post reported that the trial will focus on the damages she says she suffered, not on whether the crash happened.
For readers tracking Southern California crash litigation, the case shows why medical causation and damages evidence can become central after fault narrows. Lederer & Nojima's car accident lawyer resource explains related claim issues in California injury cases.
Sources
- USA Herald: Arnold Schwarzenegger Heads to Jury Trial as Woman Claims LA Crash Left Her With Permanent Brain Damage
- New York Post: Arnold Schwarzenegger heads to jury trial over LA crash that allegedly left woman with permanent brain damage
Results may vary. Contact our office for a case evaluation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.